Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fay Reid's avatar

You are so right, Graham, nothing about the Vietnam War was honorable or honest. It was a civil war to start with by the 'common' people against the 'aristocratic' and very corrupt regime set up by France to protect their colonial interests. Then France decided they really couldn't afford to 'protect' their rotten regime so they asked Eisenhower if he'd help their puppets fight to protect themselves because even the southern peasants couldn't be counted on to protect their overlords.

So Eisenhower sent between 500 and 700 "advisors to help train the troops. John Kennedy upped the advisors to around 1500.

I didn't strongly object until after the 1964 election when Johnson had promised to pull the advisors back and instead started rattling the sabers. I couldn't vote in '64 since I wasn't a citizen until 1967, but I had campaigned for LBJ thinking he was honest. Barry Goldwater, his opponent, was promising to nuke North Vietnam. The rest is history.

I was never sufficiently interested in the Korean war to look into it so I have no idea if it was justified or not. But the only two justifiable wars of any size we've fought since were Bosnia and the Ukraine. And perhaps Desert Storm. We should never be the aggressor in a battle. Aggression and democracy are not compatible.

Expand full comment

No posts